Comments on: Paging Through Data 2.0 http://www.rustyrazorblade.com/2006/11/paging-through-data-20/ Tech Thoughts, Mostly on LAMP - by Jon Haddad Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:50:22 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Scott Gale http://www.rustyrazorblade.com/2006/11/paging-through-data-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1340 Scott Gale Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:11:49 +0000 http://www.rustyrazorblade.com/index.php/2006/11/11/paging-through-data-20/#comment-1340 This has been around for awhile correct, at least since mysql 4.1? I have this built into my abstraction layer that connects to JDBC but I only recently added it. Great way to save the query. This has been around for awhile correct, at least since mysql 4.1? I have this built into my abstraction layer that connects to JDBC but I only recently added it. Great way to save the query.

]]> By: Peter Zaitsev http://www.rustyrazorblade.com/2006/11/paging-through-data-20/comment-page-1/#comment-907 Peter Zaitsev Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:26:57 +0000 http://www.rustyrazorblade.com/index.php/2006/11/11/paging-through-data-20/#comment-907 You can save the query and you can get up to 2 times performance improvement this way (while it most case it will be rather insignificant) but it is still very unscalable approach if you're working with large result sets 10.000+ items. Not to mention LIMIT itself is very poor for paging if offset becomes large :) You can save the query and you can get up to 2 times performance improvement this way (while it most case it will be rather insignificant) but it is still very unscalable approach if you’re working with large result sets
10.000+ items.

Not to mention LIMIT itself is very poor for paging if offset becomes large :)

]]>